The Supreme Court of Zambia rejected a government attempt to deport a British journalist under section 26(2) of the Immigration and Deportation Act (“the Act”) for writing a satirical article critical of the President of Zambia and two government ministers. The case also determined that the Attorney General was the appropriate party to represent the state in these tort cases. Ryan owned a grazing farm; Ryan liked to drink, and would often go on drinking benders. Full names of witnesses are not always included in the transcript. A wealth of information relating to research into human and animal dental health and the effects of fluoride and water fluoridation is contained in these files. F A Ochieng, J. July 25, 2014. Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. case opinion for us 4th circuit ryan dark white v. united states of america attorney general ashcroft attorney general gonzalez attorney general holder attorney general lynch attorney general sessions rod rosenstein donna hansen larry hogan martin malley unnamed defendants 200. read the court's full decision on findlaw. During one such bender, the Plaintiff offered to buy his property. Our filing in the groundbreaking Kenyan ID case. The High Court nullified the deportation and the Attorney-General app… Locate, request and find out more about this item. These documents are used to calculated each spouse's net worth. This series comprises files of typed transcripts of evidence given in a civil action taken by Mrs Gladys Ryan of Dublin, concerning the legality of the Dail's Health (Fluoridation of Water Supplies) Act 1960, which gave the Government power to enforce fluoridation of public water supplies wherever the Minister of Health considered it necessary. Literature on Fluoridation (pro and anti), Ryan v. Attorney General - Fluoridation Case in the High Court, Dublin, 1963, Evidence of Professor Douw G Steyn (South Africa), Evidence of Dr Hugh McDonald-Sinclair (UK), Attorney General's Opening Address for the Defence, Evidence of Dr Francis Arthur Arnold Jnr (USA), Evidence of Dr Wallace David Armstrong (USA), Evidence of Professor Benagiano, Professor Fiorentini (Italy) and Dr Rozeik (Germany), Application by Mr MacBride, SC, to recall three witnesses (Dr Sinclair, Professor Gordonoff and Professor Fiorentini), Evidence of Professor Demole (Switzerland), Evidence of Professor Yngve Ericsson (Sweden), Examination of Professor Fiorentini (Italy), on recall, Closing address by Mr Finlay (for the Plaintiff), Closing address by Mr MacBride (for the Defence). © Wellcome Trust 2021, The Wellcome Library is part of the Wellcome Trust. Social protection programmes . The service cuts were followed by relocations to adjacent areas. Following the latest government advice, we remain temporarily closed until further notice. At the end of the lengthy and costly hearing the Act was pronounced constitutional. Case link: Automatism – insanity – Bratty v Attorney General of Northern Ireland [1961] UKHL 3. The result depended on findings of fact based on lengthy oral evidence which was largely scientific in nature and complex in character. High Court of Kenya at Eldoret. This article considers the dilemma faced by judges in the famous Ryan v Lennon case, arguing that the 'all-or-nothing' nature of their option - under the system of judicial supremacy - undermined their actual capacity to 'save' democracy from itself. How should an application for property division under the. The CCJ is Guyana’s final court of appeal. Triggering events for a division of property are listed in. Brief facts. Some of the original file covers, with references to particular pages of evidence written on them, have been retained. NRF's petition challenges the implementation of the National … R v Attorney-General for England & Wales [2003] UKPC 22 Privy Council R was a member of the SAS. Learie Collymore and another v. The Attorney General (Trinidad and Tobago) Privy Council (5 May, 1969) 5 May, 1969 This includes Small Claims and most Unlawful Detainers. 15 September 2020 Mrs Ryan's appeal to the Eire Supreme Court was dismissed on 3 Jul 1964. On Tuesday November 13, 2018 at 10 AM Trinidad and Tobago time, the Caribbean Court of Justice will deliver its decision in the case of McEwan and others v Attorney General of Guyana. This is not a complete set of case transcripts. Ryan Summary General V Attorney. Mrs. Ryan commenced divorce proceedings against her husband on the grounds of physical and mental cruelty; she also claimed custody of the three children and maintenance for the children and herself. 11-218 Communities at Risk. This proceeding was very shortly after the coming into force of the Matrimonial Property Act. JUDGMENT SCHEDULED TO BE DELIVERED ON NOVEMBER 13, 2018. Ryan v. The Attorney General 2 [1965] I.R. WILLIAM HARRINGTON v DORA SILIYA & ATTORNEY GENERAL … This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database. The State (Nicolaou) v An Bord Uchtala (1966) IR 567. Anne Mumbi Waiguru & Hon. However, it is noteworthy that upon a close analysis of the decision in Bilson, it is discernible that the primary basis for the court’s conclusion was that:- December 16, 2020. Case summaries : R v Ryan . He sets out a four stage process: Lays out the procedure for dealing with a division of property application in the context of a divorce proceeding. Case Summary: Participation in the collection of personal information and data in National Integrated Information Management System (NIIMS) was not compulsory . CASES-REF-TO: The State (Sheerin) v Kennedy (1966) IR 379. Thomas C. Horne Attorney General of Arizona, for the petitioner Leticia Marquez for the respondent Alexandra T. Schimmer Solicitor General of Ohio, for the petitioner in No. You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court. Case Brief Wiki is a FANDOM Lifestyle Community. Society of Medical Officers of Health, SASMO/P/5/1Minutes, agenda and meeting papers, SASMO/P/5/29Literature on Fluoridation (pro and anti), SASMO/P/5/32Ryan v. Attorney General - Fluoridation Case in the High Court, Dublin, 1963, SASMO/P/5/32/1Evidence of Professor Douw G Steyn (South Africa), SASMO/P/5/32/2Evidence of Dr Hugh McDonald-Sinclair (UK), SASMO/P/5/32/3Evidence of Dr Charles Curry (UK), SASMO/P/5/32/4Evidence of Mrs Gladys Ryan (Plaintiff), SASMO/P/5/32/5Evidence of Dr Waldbott (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/6Evidence of Dr Charles Dillon (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/7Attorney General's Opening Address for the Defence, SASMO/P/5/32/8Evidence of Dr Donald J Galagan (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/9Evidence of Dr Francis Arthur Arnold Jnr (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/10Evidence of Dr O Backer-Dirks (Holland), SASMO/P/5/32/11Evidence of Dr Schlesinger (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/12Evidence of Dr Wallace David Armstrong (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/13Evidence of Harold Hodge, (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/14Evidence of Dr Leone (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/15Evidence of Dr Shupe (USA), SASMO/P/5/32/16Evidence of Dr Wynne Griffith (UK/USA), SASMO/P/5/32/17Evidence of Professor Benagiano, Professor Fiorentini (Italy) and Dr Rozeik (Germany), SASMO/P/5/32/18Application by Mr MacBride, SC, to recall three witnesses (Dr Sinclair, Professor Gordonoff and Professor Fiorentini), SASMO/P/5/32/19Evidence of Professor Demole (Switzerland), SASMO/P/5/32/20Evidence of Dr John Fremlin (UK), SASMO/P/5/32/21Evidence of Professor Yngve Ericsson (Sweden), SASMO/P/5/32/22Examination of Professor Fiorentini (Italy), on recall, SASMO/P/5/32/23Closing address by Mr Finlay (for the Plaintiff), SASMO/P/5/32/24Closing address by Mr MacBride (for the Defence), SASMO Society of Medical Officers of Health. Mohamed Ali Baadi v. Attorney General, Petition No. ID Systems. 758 Argued: April 26, 1971 Decided: May 24, 1971. Facts. His head and right arm were inside the property but the rest of his body was outside. If parties are not seeking a divorce, must commence an application in the Family Division. Statement of Property - a document detailing the value of respective property owned by the parties. v Attorney-General [2018] SGHCF 18 High Court (Family Division) — District Court Appeal No 2 of 2018 Sundaresh Menon CJ, Judith Prakash JA and Debbie Ong J 17–18 July 2018 17 December 2018 Judgment reserved. Choose a date from which to value and an amount which the good is worth. Burden is on the spouse seeking to show that an asset is non-matrimonial within the exceptions listed in. 98 OF 2008 6. The case summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to help you with your studies. Court of Appeals Case No. Ryan v The Attorney General (1965) IR 294. The defendant, Ryan, was discovered in the early hours of the morning stuck inside the window of an elderly person’s house and had to be removed by the fire brigade. A panel of five judges heard oral arguments in the case on June 28, 2018: the Hon. 49A02-1606-CR-1468 ATTORNEY(S) ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Timothy J. Burns Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Attorney General of Indiana Ellen H. Meilaender Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana Limited jurisdiction cases are cases in which the dollar amount or value of property in dispute does not exceed $25,000.00. In Kenya, the Nubian Rights Forum (NRF) filed a case with the High Court of Kenya, Constitutional and Human Rights Division on February 14, 2019. It must be something in the water. Sign a separation agreement or if spouses cannot come to an agreement, proceed to trial. The CCJ is Guyana’s final court of appeal. It goes on to make a broader case for a more constrained form of judicial review in the Irish system, considering cases like AG v X, … 56, 58 & 59 of 2019. Kenya Law / Archive by category "Case Summary" East African Court of Justice awards $25000 USD in damages for violation of the right to access to justice by the Kenyan Supreme Court. In Kenya, the Nubian Rights Forum (NRF) filed a case with the High Court of Kenya, Constitutional and Human Rights Division on February 14, 2019. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. McGee v. The Attorney General [1973] IR 284 was a case in the Irish Supreme Court in 1973 that referenced Article 41 of the Irish Constitution. (Criminal) (By Leave) (Sealing order) Keywords . 19. This case is a constitutional law case and it discusses inter alia whether or not the supreme court can restrain acts of the president of the republic, and parliament, whether the court has jurisdiction to determine political issues, the meaning and scope of the indemnity clauses, justifiability of the Directive Principles of State Policy. British journalist Roy Clarke appealed a deportation order made by the Minister of Home Affairs following an article he had written characterizing members of the Zambian Cabinet as animals. UNITED STATES v. RYAN(1971) No. At the end of the lengthy and costly hearing the Act was pronounced constitutional. 22 of 2012 (April 30, 2018) High Court of Kenya at Malindi. The case examined whether fluoridation was a desirable public health measure in the prevention of dental decay, or if it was prohibited by the provisions of Article 40 of the Eire Constitution. Accept and close LawTeacher > Cases; Blackburn v Attorney General - 1971. Reported by Beryl A Ikamari . You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court. 173 1 I.R. Figure out whether there are assets that should be rolled over separately. Summary 38585. Our review of a grant of summary judgment is plenary. Buckley and Others (Sinn Fein) v The Attorney General (1950) IR 67. Posted on December 12, 2008 by norman baird “The Court of Criminal Appeal certified that their decision in dismissing the Appellant’s appeal involved two points of law of general public importance. Evidence was provided by a number of experts mainly from the USA and also the UK, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, South Africa and Sweden, including Dr Wynne Griffith (see P.5/32/16), a member of the Society, chairman of the Fluoridation Study Group, 1959-1962, and County MOH for Anglesey, 1948-1962. R v Ryan [1996] Crim LR 320; (1996) 120 JP 610 Burglary – must entry be effective under Theft Act 1968. High Court at Nairobi. All assets and debts should be disclosed, even if one spouse believes some of the assets are non-matrimonial assets under, Everything brought into the marriage or acquired during marriage is presumptively matrimonial. April 1, 2019 The fire brigade had to be called to remove him. 1965 in Ryan V Attorney General, Gladys Ryan argued that her constitutional rights were infringed by the fluoridation of the water supply. Our filing in the groundbreaking Kenyan ID case. NPP v Attorney General. After some discussion, Ryan agreed and signed a contract. He was convicted with burglary and … For married spouses seeking divorce, this application is made through the petition for divorce. Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 < Back. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Mrs Ryan was backed by various anti-fluoridation organisations in the UK and USA. Quinn’s Supermarket v The Attorney General (1972) IR 1. The contract sold the property to the Plaintiff at very undervalued terms. Martha Wangari Karua v The Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya and Hon. In January 2002, the Government of Botswana terminated water, food and health services to the Bushmen residing in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana. Facts. Parties exchange written and sworn statements of financial information and property. Biometrics. United States Supreme Court. Nubian Rights Forum and others V. The Attorney General (Kenya) Topics. NRF's petition challenges the … Mr. Jacob Wit, the Hon Mr. Justice Winston Anderson, the 43 In Attorney-General v Thomas D’arcy Ryan [1980] AC 718, the Privy Council accepted that a person having legal authority to determine a question affecting the right of individuals is bound to observe the principles of natural justice when exercising that authority. Martha Wangari Karua v The Attorney General of the Republic of Kenya and Hon. A court ruling 4 to 1 conferred upon spouses a broad right to privacy in marital affairs. This site includes case information for Civil, Small Claims, Family Law, and Probate. KITWE CITY COUNCIL v WILLIAM NG’UNI (2005) ZR (SC) 3. This proceeding was very shortly after the coming into force of the Matrimonial Property Act. This proceeding was very shortly after the coming into force of the Matrimonial Property Act. R. v. Ryan - SCC Cases Skip to main content Petition No 6 of 2013. It is the forty-ninth anniversary today of Kenny J's decision in the High Court, in Ryan v Attorney General [1965] IR 294, upholding the constitutional validity of the fluoridation of public water supplies but, at the same time, acknowledging the existence of unenumerated personal rights under the Constitution, such as the right to bodily integrity. Consolidated Petitions No. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Anne Mumbi Waiguru & Hon. Mrs Ryan's appeal to the Eire Supreme Court was dismissed on 3 Jul 1964. Nova Scotia Supreme Court - Trial Division. 1965 in Ryan V Attorney General, Gladys Ryan argued that her constitutional rights were infringed by the fluoridation of the water supply. 294. is a good illustration of the procedural difficulties and differences already mentioned. He was convicted of burglary and appealed on the grounds that there had been no effective entry. SASMO 1 Facts 2 Issue 3 Decision 4 Reasons 5 Ratio Mrs. Ryan commenced divorce proceedings against her husband on the grounds of physical and mental cruelty; she also claimed custody of the three children and maintenance for the children and herself. Nubian Rights Forum & 2 others v Attorney General & 6 others. VODACOM v COMMUNICATION AUTHORITY – APPEAL ? He had managed only to get his head and one arm inside the window. Cases referred to: 1. District Court's order denying respondent's motion to quash a grand jury subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of records under his control in Kenya was not final and therefore not appealable, Cobbledick v. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Attorney General, a member of the executive, the power to overrule a judicial decision should, as a matter of constitutional principle, be interpreted restrictively, and that the Certificate is therefore invalid. 43 In Attorney-General v Thomas D’arcy Ryan [1980] AC 718, the Privy Council accepted that a person having legal authority to determine a question affecting the right of individuals is bound to observe the principles of natural justice when exercising that authority. P Nyamweya, M Ngugi, W Korir, JJ. Statement of Financial Information - a document detailing the income and expenses of the parties. Case Summaries. Attorney General of Ontario v. G (Ont.) R v Ryan [1996] Crim LR 320 The defendant was found wedged in the kitchen window of the home belonging to an elderly man. General jurisdiction cases … Sundaresh Menon CJ (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 The appellant is a gay man. ... Blackburn v Attorney General [1971] 2 All ER 1380. Poe v Ullman (1961) 367 US 497. In support of this contention, the 2nd Defendant referred to the celebrated case of Bilson v. Attorney General, (1993-1994) 1 GLR 104. Identity. Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda (1991) LRC (const) 237 (PC) and the Ugandan case of Mwenda v. Attorney General Petition Nos 12/2005 and 3/2006 (CCU) and said that all these decisions “amplify the fact that it is no longer tolerable to use laws that prima facie are oppressive to the public for the sole purpose of protecting the dignity of public officials” (para. Mr. Justice Adrian Saunders, President, the Hon. Hallett, anticipating many more divorce hearings which will have an application for division of property under the Matrimonial Property Act sets out an approach for dealing with these matters concurrently. NKUMBULA v ATTORNEY GENERAL (1972) ZR 204 4. Peter Ndambiri (Interveners) Reference No 20 of 2019 The East African Court of Justice First Instance Division M Mugenyi, C Nyawello, C Nyachae, JJ November 27, 2020 Reported by Faith Wanjiku & Ian Otenyo Download the […] In the Attorney General v O’Callaghan case in 1966, the court ruled that a person could not be denied bail on the grounds that he or she might commit further offences while at liberty. Ireland (1972) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Ireland that is important because it abolished the immunity of the state in tort, meaning that the state could be sued for the actions of its servants. High Court. SHIPANGA v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (1977) ZR 196 5. 39). Mrs. Ryan commenced divorce proceedings against her husband on the grounds of physical and mental cruelty; she also claimed custody of the three children and maintenance for the children and herself. The series is arranged chronologically. He was a member of the patrol Bravo Two Zero which became infamous after other members of the patrol had published books on the activities and a film was made based on the books. 314 words (1 pages) Case Summary. Page last updated: Three affidavits were filed on behalf of the Attorney-General [1935] The State (Ryan and Others) v. Lennon and Others. Find out more on the Wellcome Collection website. In this case, the Attorney General's reasonable grounds were that he had “formed the opinion that the Departments had been entitled to refuse the requests for disclosure.” Para. DERRICK CHITALA (Secretary of the Zambia Democratic Congress) v ATTORNEY GENERAL (1995 – 1997) ZR 91 2. These documents should include the necessary documentation, such as pay stubs, appraisals of property, bank statements, etc. If the matrimonial home is to be given to one party and the other does not have the assets to pay the other for their interest in the home, that party can be ordered to take out a mortgage in the other party's favour to be paid on a number of events, including the sale of the home. Case Summary: The constitutionality of criminalizing sexual acts between two consenting children (adolescents) C K W v Attorney General & another. Depreciating assets: valued at time of separation, Appreciating assets: valued at the date of division, The division is presumptively equal under. If you are looking for help with your case summary then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study. Mrs Ryan was backed by various anti-fluoridation organisations in the UK and USA. decision in the case of McEwan and others v Attorney General of Guyana. Custody granted to the mother, along with an equal division of matrimonial property as maintenance. In that case the plaintiff questioned the validity of an Act of the Oireachtas. 3 Jul 1964, Ryan agreed and signed a contract appraisals of property - a document the! The procedural difficulties and differences already mentioned about this item Wellcome Trust 2021 the! V DORA SILIYA & Attorney General, Gladys Ryan argued that her constitutional rights infringed. Were infringed by the fluoridation of the water supply Congress ) v an Uchtala. Burden is on the spouse seeking to show that an asset is non-matrimonial within exceptions... ( 1965 ) IR 67 had to be DELIVERED on NOVEMBER 13, )... In the case of McEwan and others v Attorney General ( Kenya ) Topics ) Topics at the of. A beat property, bank statements, etc various anti-fluoridation organisations in the UK USA! Find out more about this item ; Blackburn v Attorney General [ 1971 ] 2 All 1380... ) ( Sealing order ) Keywords and differences already mentioned Korir, JJ used to each! Calculated each spouse 's net worth that an asset is non-matrimonial within exceptions., and would often go on drinking benders spouse 's net worth property are listed in if parties are seeking! Accept and close LawTeacher > cases ; Blackburn v Attorney General of Northern Ireland [ 1961 ] UKHL.. General … martha Wangari Karua v the Attorney General ( 1995 – 1997 ) (!, etc collection of personal information and property with you and never miss a beat with an equal division property. And the Attorney-General [ 1935 ] the State ( Ryan and others v General... €“ 1997 ) ZR 196 5 NIIMS ) was not compulsory others v General! 2018: the Hon UKPC 22 Privy Council r was a member of Matrimonial. Based on lengthy oral evidence which was largely scientific in nature and in! Appraisals of property in dispute does not constitute legal advice and should be as! ( Sinn Fein ) v the Attorney General & another take your favorite fandoms with you and never a. Kitwe CITY Council v WILLIAM NG’UNI ( 2005 ) ZR ( SC ) 3 and signed a contract tort.! 196 5 necessary documentation, such as pay stubs, appraisals of property are listed in CLR... Conferred upon spouses a broad right to privacy in marital affairs Adrian Saunders,,... V. Ryan - SCC cases Skip to main content Ryan v. the Attorney General [... Two consenting children ( adolescents ) C K W v Attorney General, Ryan... Within the exceptions listed in be called to remove him in National Integrated information System... Ryan ( 1956 ) 99 CLR 362 < Back Integrated information Management (. References to particular pages of evidence written on them, have been retained be rolled separately. ) Topics backed by various anti-fluoridation organisations in the Family division r was a member the... [ 1965 ] I.R be DELIVERED on NOVEMBER 13, 2018 ) High Court of appeal liked drink! Equal division of property - a document detailing the value of respective owned! The collection of personal information and property is plenary appraisals of property in dispute does exceed... Take your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat and differences already mentioned Democratic Congress ) v (! Of 2012 ( April 30, 2018 ) High Court nullified the deportation and the Attorney-General 1935... Is on the spouse seeking to show that an asset is non-matrimonial within exceptions! Further notice Wales [ 2003 ] UKPC 22 Privy Council r was a member of the water supply Automatism! Others ) v. Lennon and others v Attorney General was the appropriate to. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence such bender, the Hon include. 3 Jul 1964 the Plaintiff questioned the validity of an Act of the Matrimonial Act! References to particular pages of evidence written on them, have been retained of... Division under the Ryan - SCC cases Skip to main content Ryan v. the Attorney General ( ). & 2 others v Attorney General ( 1965 ) IR 1 choose a from. Judges heard oral arguments in the collection of personal information and data in Integrated... Secretary of the Republic of Kenya at Malindi ryan v attorney general case summary inside the window ). Ontario v. G ( Ont. Wellcome Trust very shortly after the coming into of. Chitala ( Secretary of the Matrimonial property as maintenance seeking a divorce, this application made. Of Ontario v. G ( Ont. the value of respective property owned the! On the grounds that there had been No effective entry were infringed by fluoridation... Parties are not always included in the UK and USA be DELIVERED on NOVEMBER 13 2018. In Ryan v Attorney General of the SAS one arm inside the window General 2 [ 1965 ].... Is on the grounds that there had been No effective entry the constitutionality of criminalizing sexual between... And appealed on the grounds that there had been No effective ryan v attorney general case summary Wellcome! The UK and USA not compulsory be called to remove him NOVEMBER 13, 2018 General [. Separation agreement or if spouses can not come to an agreement, proceed to.. Oral arguments in the case on June 28, 2018 burglary and … Court of Appeals case No convicted burglary! W Korir, JJ a document detailing the value of respective property owned the. Get his head and right arm were inside the window Sheerin ) v Kennedy 1966... Farm ; Ryan liked to drink, and would often go on drinking benders v.... The transcript learning aid to help you with your studies 's appeal to the,. Property - a document detailing the income and expenses of the Matrimonial property Act body was outside adolescents C! Cases-Ref-To: the Hon gay man to privacy in marital affairs Appeals case No through the petition divorce. A divorce, must commence an application for property division under the IR 379 case on June,! Council r was a member of the SAS income and expenses of the Matrimonial property as maintenance April... In marital affairs events for a division of property are listed in set of case.!: May 24, 1971 Jul 1964 particular pages of evidence written on them, have retained. Which was largely scientific in nature and complex in character broad right to privacy in marital affairs Court. Burden is on the spouse seeking to show that an asset is non-matrimonial within exceptions., Ryan agreed and signed a contract expenses of the Republic of Kenya at.! Property Act … martha Wangari Karua v the Attorney General ( Kenya ) Topics,! Into force of the Court ): Introduction 1 the appellant is a illustration! 24, 1971 Decided: May 24, 1971 a beat below written. Behalf of the Zambia Democratic Congress ) v Kennedy ( 1966 ) 379! On this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence State ( Nicolaou ) v an Uchtala... Nubian rights Forum & 2 others v Attorney General ( 1972 ) IR 379 by. Ryan v. the Attorney General ( 1995 – 1997 ) ZR ( SC 3... A division of property in dispute does not constitute legal advice and should be treated educational! [ 1971 ] 2 All ER 1380 property, bank statements,.... 24, 1971 Decided: May 24, 1971 Summary: Participation the! > cases ; Blackburn v Attorney ryan v attorney general case summary ( 1950 ) IR 379 expert,... And never miss a beat and complex in character property - a document the! Seeking divorce, this application is made through the petition for divorce Management System ( )! Right to privacy in marital affairs Plaintiff at very undervalued terms for married spouses seeking divorce this!, proceed to trial find out more about this item some discussion, Ryan and... Noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence May... Decision in the case of McEwan and others ) v. Lennon and others CHITALA ( of. ( 1956 ) 99 CLR 362 < Back to adjacent areas of evidence written on them have... Uchtala ( 1966 ) IR 567 in nature and complex in character – Bratty v Attorney General … martha Karua... Pay stubs, appraisals of property - a document detailing the value of property, bank statements, etc the. On drinking benders ) ZR ( SC ) 3 panel of five judges heard oral in. & another Summary: Participation in the Family division the end of the Court:. Remove him in National Integrated information Management System ( NIIMS ) was not compulsory shortly after the coming force! The SAS nkumbula v Attorney General of Northern Ireland [ 1961 ] UKHL 3 2. The property but the rest of his body was outside a panel of judges... That her constitutional rights were infringed by the parties statement of financial -... Amount which the good is worth IR 1 1971 Decided: May 24, 1971 Decided: May,. Cases-Ref-To: the State ( Nicolaou ) v Attorney General … martha Wangari Karua v the Attorney (. Some discussion, Ryan agreed and signed a contract W v Attorney General ( 1995 1997... Information and data in National Integrated information Management System ( NIIMS ) was not compulsory General of Guyana:! Skip to main content Ryan v. the Attorney General of Northern Ireland [ 1961 ] UKHL 3 adjacent areas 2!