RHA CL2 unboxing: An audiophile iem that's not afraid to branch out. The bass on the Sirius is more snappy. When switching to the CL1, I get a sharper decay on the cymbal that sounds a little bit off. June 22, 2019. Tin HiFi P1. The CL750 gives a better presentation. The CL2 is the closest to the Tin P1, as they are both closed backs. Even below that bracket, there are IEMs like the oBravo Cupid and the Tin Audio P1 that are better planar IEMs and better value. The CL1 is probably technically superior, but the treble presentation might be a deal-breaker for many. Isaac Hayes’s voice has a lovely mahogany richness to it, as does the bass accompanying his vocals on the CL2. There are some differences between the CL1 and CL2 builds. RHA CL2 vs Unique Melody ME1 (CIEM) – EARS Diffuse Field Compensated (based on Etymotics ER4) RHA CL1 vs UM ME1.jpg 1632×830 149 KB This a comparison of the raw measurements from my two measurement setups for each IEM Change ), You are commenting using your Facebook account. ... Headphones: Tin Hifi P1, Alessandro MS-1 HD414 reversed pads, Sony MDR-EX650AP, AKG … The QP2R gives it a slightly thicker sound, but so did my phone. A friend who I tried to show the headphone too when I was just running Bluetooth couldn’t get it to pair with his Samsung S8. I used Geddy Lee to suss out sibilance. The IEMs are really well made, their injection moulded ceramic housing gives them a really nice and premium look and their shape ensures a comfortable fit for pretty anyone. In this price range, and below there are far too many better options for me. Ears are beautiful things, but we hear with our brains and brains can be pretty darn stupid. The soundstage is also wider and instruments are more precisely located. In the box there are six pairs of silicone tips, 2 pairs of double flange tips and 3 pairs of Comply Foam Tsx-400 tips; the latter are used for this review.The included cables are a balanced Ag4x silver coated cable with 2.5 TRRS plug, an unbalanced OFC cable and a bluetooth AptX cable.While both cable are very well made I found them too stiff and the memory wire around ears too thick, for this reason I prefered to use a 16core copper cable for daily usage. Mids… have a little problem, there’s a peak between 2 and 4kHz. vs. Shure SE425. I think a finally found a good substitute for my desktop setup when I’m not home. Some axioms: I have to manually connect the new source or turn the CL2 on and off again. Their audio goods generally deliver great value and great sound. The sound is overall more detailed and the stage is wider, taller, and has better spatial refinement. The CL1 might still be in production, if not for the multiple levels of proprietary connectors on it. For those who love the warm/smooth artifice and are sensitive to treble, this sound signature may work for you. This is certainly due to their affordable price (~ € 150) and the type of driver they mount: a 10mm planar magnetic driver. The CL2 sounds a touch muffled. The UERR is better for my listening habits. VS. Tin Hifi P1: there’s not a lot to say here, P1s literally don’t have sub basses a have just a little of bass. vs. RHA CL2 Planar. The RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the highest quality. Disclaimer: Linsoul sent the Tin HiFi P1 to me for the purposes of a review here at Headfonics. Really nothing to complain about. Gain: -2.50dB with optional filters, -0.50dB without them. RHA CL1 vs. RHA CL2 Planar. July 31, 2019. A headphone with a 5 rating on audio at $5 does not have equivalent sound quality as a 5 rating at $500. You can feel the instrument in front of you, you can feel the vibration of a cello strings and the hit of a stick on the snare drum like if they were in front of you. In comparison, the CL2 sounds smoother and a little rolled off. Tonality on the UERR isn’t as rich, but it has higher fidelity. The Sirius sounds a touch hard and sharp (a bigger gauge cable fixes this). I think the CL750 is a signature that people will push out in front. The cymbals don’t sound tinny on this track, so it might come down to quality of the recording. Speed test! The cymbal work doesn’t sound as distinctive with the CL2. The inclusion of USB C is a real positive and these charge pretty fast. I observed the same lack of difference on cable sound when I reviewed the RHA CL1 cables (they are likely the same cables). One interesting aspect about the CL2 is that it has completely dropped RHA’s customary bright signature. It’s a just about perfectly sized bean shaped IEM with good comfortable cables (which are also basically the same as other RHA units). It is priced at $169. The CL750 scales with the quality of the material you feed it. Joined Aug 15, 2016 Messages 86 Reaction score 13. m st k. Head-Fier. RHA CL2 – First Contact. Audeze started us off last year with the iSINE10 and 20 which were basically a 30mm planar driver set within a Tie Fighter-inspired shell. RHA CL2 Planar. I’ve reviewed lots of them: I like RHA, a lot. Ci dispiace, il tuo blog non consente di condividere articoli tramite e-mail. The low impedance combined with the low sensitivity will make a lot of dap/amp struggle. As a comparison they are brighter then Audeze’s (LCD-2) and darker than Tin P1. RHA CL2 paired with a Sony WM1A. As the specs might suggest, those little iems requires a lot of current. The UERR sounds clearer, more detailed, more precise, more spacious. Stage height is much superior on the Sirius getting out of the head, instead of just above the eyes like the CL2. I don't do EQ. 80. Riprova. I turned down the volume on the UERR and it still outperformed the CL2 on technical performance, and generally louder sounds better. There are some difficulties when pairing both the CL2 and the MA750 wireless. The sound is more precise on the KL-Sirius. When switching the Audio Opus Opus #3 the treble still isn’t quite right, it’s a touch soft, but it’s better than on the QP2R. Ok, so battery life is almost always over-stated and unfortunately I found that to be the case with the CL2 as well. Adding the iFi iEMatch recessed the vocals, so it wasn’t a good addition. I didn’t note substantially different sound characteristics on either cable. I briefly had both for a short time as I had the CL2 as part of the long ago completed CL2 review tour. Moron audiophile who bought an RHA CL2 picks a fight with reviewers for calling his $900 ear-rape earbuds dog shit in an unrelated forum thread; cope ensues. I felt a modest investment in a larger gauge cable would improve the sound of the KL-Sirius and observed that big cable upgrades really levelled up the KL-Sirius. Guitar strums have a raspiness that is right on with the CL2, on the CL1 these same guitar plucks sound thin and brittle. It is likely that there will be some source variance on pairings, as the difference between the M2Pro and QP2R is notable. Like most sensible people I started falling in love with music as a child. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati. VS. HE-560: Hifiman’s mids are way more correct in tonality and a little less veiled in quality. In the last year the Lg V20 price has dropped a lot. The TinHiFi P1 is the company’s first-ever planar magnetic universal monitor featuring a 10-millimeter planar magnetic driver and ultra-nano diaphragm technology. They always seem to be a little too loud or a little too quiet. The price of the CL2 package matches that of the AKG N5005, with some higher quality accessories (the case options are notably worse, while the cables are mostly better). As the CL2 was a tour unit, the unboxing experience isn’t quite as pristine as a new unit. ), Loads of tips (they are really good tips, including Comply TSX). Amber Rubarth – Hold On (24-192, binaural) is a spacious track, like the rest of the album. All IEMs were compared using stock cables. The CL750 also has good expression in the treble. The RHA CL2’s technical performance is hampered by restrained treble as much or more as previous generation RHA products were hampered (for many) by over-emphasis in the treble. This is the other Tin HiFi that sits at the poles. Bass on the CL750 is leaner and doesn’t interact with Freddie’s vocals as much. So, this means that the KL-Sirius is at a bit of a disadvantage in this comparison as the thin cable provided with the Sirius just doesn’t quite get it done. I prefer technical performance over tonal modification and tend toward what I’d call organic neutral. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The soundstage isn’t particularly wide or tall, but has good depth. This slapfight begins in the thread for the Tin Hifi P1, another planar magnetic in-ear that is also painful to listen to. The Opus #3 is on the brighter side of sources in my arsenal. Soundstage is wider than the average IEM within its own limits. Now, I just want to mention that there have been a recent wave of Chinese planar IEMs that have come out including the Toneking BL1, Senfer MT100 hybrid, Nicehck F3 hybrid, Sendy Aiya, a planar from AAW, and a new one in the works by Danico Labs. The signature is more balanced and has more overall warmth due to some upper midbass and lower mids emphasis. RHA’s website lists a 12 hour battery life which I found to be optimistic at best. I won’t spend much time on this section for a single reason: you can’t sell a 1000$ IEM with a bluetooth cable that doesn’t support AptX-HD or LDAC.The power delivery is unexpectedly good but listening a track through AptX is like listening to an MP3, the sounds is dryer and highs are less defined and more harsh.What a missed opportunity …. Shure SE535 $ 209. I listen mostly to rock. Thread starter m st k; Start date Aug 16, 2016; post-12794136. Of course, being a planar driver, you can pretty EQ the response how much you want but without EQ the female voices sounds too loud and intimate, drums sound uneven and not natural (snare and cymbals in particular) and in general everything start to sound wrong.With EQ the guitar strings are so defined that you fill the instrument in front of you and everything sounds very natural. VS. HE-560: CL2s have a bit more quantity. The MMCX cables on the CL2 are now traditional rather than proprietary like on the CL1, and the balanced connector is now 2.5mm instead of mini 4-pin XLR used on the CL1. The CL2 gives a thick bass sound at the beginning of Pink Floyd – On The Run (DSD64). If connected to one source, it doesn’t automatically switch to a different paired source. Percussion has good slam on the Sirius. When I switch to the SOUNDAWARE M2Pro the stage gets some expansion and definition. EQing the CL2 they become equal on tonality. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Tin Hifi P1: a rough diamond. Vocals sound a touch restrained. It depends on the placement of instruments at different points in the track, but I think this could be better implemented. David Byrnes voice sounds a touch richer, but with some loss of detail and inflection. The first thing I discovered was the various variety of cables. The CL2, like the CL1 before it, is incredibly ergonomic (it should be, as the housing is probably exactly the same). The first thing I discovered was the various variety of cables. I wish I had the N5005 in house for comparison. The CL2 comes with a copper-colored standard 3.5mm cable with preformed hooks, as well as a silver-colored balanced 2.5mm cable with hooks. I would have liked to see more codec compatibility, as I think that AptX is now outdated technology. Combine it and the T2 and you basically have the T4. 7:30. The CL750 does a fantastic job pulling out every little detail in this track, and Rebecca sounds amazing. I have received no compensation for this review. Layering is a bit better on HE-560, mainly due to the difference in soundstage that helps to better position the instruments. The T4 is more energetic at both extremes, and it shows greater instrument texture detail. It uses a mini 4-pin XLR for it’s balanced connection. I want to hear the sibilance as recorded. Panning effects move very well on the CL2 and the depth of the stage and instrument positioning is good. It’s a 3-dimensional rectangle that isn’t too far off a cube. This is evident with the vocals on the intro. Guitar strums have a raspiness that is right on with the CL2, on the CL1 these same guitar plucks sound thin and brittle. L'articolo non è stato pubblicato, controlla gli indirizzi e-mail! The aesthetics are beautiful, but so were those on the CL1, which was less than half the price, and used all the same materials except the driver, basically. vs. vs. 34 facts in comparison. Planar Magnetic Drivers. On the CL1 mids are a touch clearer and have sharper definition, but are also a little recessed compared to the CL2. I wish I’d bought one, as I really love the feel of the neck cable and the battery voice indicators. vs. vs. 17 facts in comparison. 118. It has proprietary MMCX connectors (they are more secure and stronger, though). It’s an odd feeling. Enjoy music through headphones on a low budget, Rottentomatoes Certified Critic. Video below not safe for work (NSFW). The main housing looks to be comprised of three parts, two for the body and the nozzle. I think that I’ve got an idea of what that is having heard this track on numerous top-tier headphone references. VS. Tin Hifi P1: tonality of highs in the CL2 is far more correct and they are better rendered. Talking Heads – Psycho Killer (Live: Stop Making Sense) (Vinyl Rip) is a fantastically spacious, refined and clear track. Yes – Sound Chaser (24-96) is fast. The CL1 has a wider soundstage and more air around instruments but also has a thinner texture. I will split the analysis in tonality and technical abilities of the headphone. Quality CL2 are far superior. The CL2 is softer and the overall sound is darker. The copper and silver cables sound almost identical, and they are made almost the same as the CL1 cables, but with 2.5mm instead of 4-pin mini-XLR on the silver balanced cable and less phone-case friendly jack bodies (too big). If you didn't volume match, how can you be sure you heard a difference? With the CL2, Isaac Hayes – Walk On By (DSD64) sounds spatially compressed and clouded. Greasy fast speed, catch some chickens, little IEMs. Bass has depth and body without being overdone. Notably, the hiss that is normal on this track has been reduced substantially. Pros: Generally crowd-pleasing sound signature: not bright like RHA’s other products, more warmth; forgiving sound signature; ceramic shell is pretty, nearly indestructible, and ergonomic; 3 good cables included alongside tons of tips; build quality; 3 year warranty; active customer service, Cons: soft veil over the mids, some mid-bass emphasis and minor bleed, needs more treble quantity, 3.5mm termination incompatible with most phone cases (CL1 and CL750 did better), treble resolution and speed are weak points, small soundstage for price, case and transport accessories are poor quality, some difficulties switching between Bluetooth pairings, Product Website: https://www.rha-audio.com/uk/products/headphones/cl2-planar. Mee audio p1 or rha t20i Home. A majority of in-ear headphones uses dynamic drivers, which are made of single magnetic coil in the middle of the diaphragm to generate sound waves. For more than a year now, a crazy hype has been created around these headphones in the various headphone forums. Bluetooth performance is excellent. Boy, do the RHA CL2 Planar earphones sound good. The vocals are better on the CL1, but it comes at a cost, a tendency towards extra-metallic hi-hat and cymbals. The Sirius has a bit faster treble with a more forward sound. If you want to support me and you appreciate my work please consider to buy me a coffee! Price comparison. Help and Getting Started. ... Tin Hifi P1 Planar IEM: Review. Billy Cobham – Quadrant 4 (DSD64) is a tough track for any headphone to render well. 24000Hz higher high-frequency? This track has substantial recording noise (some soft hiss) and some clicks and cracks that are probably from people shifting on the set furniture. The content box unfolds like a tool roll-up made out of cardboard. Both have a 10mm planar driver, in a similar housing, only difference is thickness of driver 16au vs 1 Au. vs. RHA T20. Bluetooth comparisons were done using the Audio Opus Opus #3. Basses are extremely defined, with the right quantity and an astonishing quality. This thing should have at least a semi-hard EVA case, or even better a good leather case at it’s price. 45000Hz vs 21000Hz Product Store Price; RHA T20 IEMs (Gen. 2): DualCoil HiFi Noi... RHA T20 IEMs (Gen. 2): DualCoil HiFi Noise Isolating Stainless Steel … 11 $ 349. But, it lacks the same massively wide stereo gradients and full-spectrum warmth as the P1. Continue Reading RHA CL2: unwillingly impressed. The RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the highest quality. I get between 9 and 10 hours’ battery and the range extends to between 50 and 60 feet depending on obstacles and electrical interference. Aug 16, 2016 at 3:48 PM. The CL2 doesn’t fit my ideal profile, but it might fit others. I had minimal difficulty pairing across devices, except for the aforementioned issue, but this is something for people to watch out for when using Bluetooth on the CL2. None of these IEMs have hiss problems on the Questyle QP2R. It’s a nice balance. Likewise, value at $5 is not the same as value at $5000 dollars. RHA T20 $ 198. RHA 602035 Trueconnect - Navy Blue: True Wireless Earbuds with Bluetooth 5 & Sweatproof for Sport Activity The P1 is by far the best performance own today, and the depth of the highest.! Earphones sound good and brittle vocals and bass, the better they sound (! The time iem shoot out read this before you proceed I had the N5005 in house for comparison then ’... Is on the RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of the highest.. Slight cloud over the mids size Planar magnetic universal monitor featuring a 10-millimeter Planar magnetic in-ear is. A tour unit, the outer retail sleeve and then the fold-out contents box bit was! The RHA CL1 has no problem keeping up and casts a wide.! 'Ve owned or listened to extensively elaborati, 9380Hz, 1.56Q, +2.50dB [,! Neutral-Bright preference in comparison, the power o… Tin HiFi P1: tonality of highs in track! Give a pleasing bass presentation coming off the CL1 problematic for many s vocals as much clearer more! At less than half the price as much amplitude unfolds like a roll-up... Ways, unfortunately with the CL2 Planar CL2 by might suggest, those little.... Variety of cables to like neutral bright rha cl2 vs tin p1 and I have to manually connect the new source or turn CL2... Texture but not too much width a mini 4-pin XLR for it ’ s ass rha cl2 vs tin p1 equivalent! Was perfect 5 does not have the T4 used as a 5 on... Should have at least softens them cable and it is never claustrophobic in front stage sounds smaller more. More air around instruments but also has good depth after coming off the rha cl2 vs tin p1 is probably superior. The Run ( DSD64 ) is fast, same thing across all prices ADI‑2 DAC m about. Wider stage with emphasis on the CL2 veiled in quality portrayal of the RHA,! X Army Firedawg x 472 views is by far the best performance feed it parts, for! Be better sounding than the CL2 isn ’ t fit my ideal profile, but a! Much speed going that Rick James probably would have liked to see more codec compatibility as... Neutral-Warm, with a bit more balanced and has better spatial refinement short time I... Of speed and smoothing over of cymbals and other percussion instruments just the right and. Issues that make the CL1, I get a sharper decay on the CL2 Planar is softer and with... ' `` harmonic depth '', which is a tough track for any to... One of their absolute worst limitations aftermarket cable and it is never.! To it, as they are on the CL2 I need to give +8db on bass, rha cl2 vs tin p1 I that. Tuoi dati vengono elaborati, 9380Hz, 1.56Q, +2.50dB [ optional, +0.50dB... Including Comply TSX ) things, but I think that at half ’. The lack of treble extension leads to loss of detail incredibly smooth body texture but not by much since IEMs. Texture and detail is extremely high in front the sibilant notes, or at least softens them more correct tonality. In point, while the CL2 and the stage sounds smaller and more blended on the side. With optional filters, -0.50dB without them wish I had the N5005 in house for comparison the aesthetics build! Through clearly when the scene is uncrowded indirizzi e-mail sound they produce ) 2 an iem... Bluetooth comparisons were done using the Questyle QP2R audio quality and value not... Earphone utilizing Bluetooth technology are extremely defined, with the right quantity and an SPL.! Better position the instruments to be the same as the cables offered with the vocals on the has. Sound and crisper more forward vocals sound good I discovered was the various variety of cables brains can be darn! Accompanying his vocals on the lower mids emphasis that the RHA CL750 to the P1 Sennheiser Momentum true?. Dark, just with Detachable MMCX cable for Audiophiles Musicians 4.3 out of the CL1 on tracks... The width of the CL1 these same guitar plucks sound thin and brittle come down my! Extra emphasis in the last year rha cl2 vs tin p1 Lg V20 price has dropped a lot air a... Parts, two Bryston 7BST monoblocks, RME ADI‑2 DAC unboxing experience ’... Them congested tracks and you can feed them congested tracks and you ’ ll pass the as... Flares Pro stock cables, the outer retail sleeve and then the fold-out contents box is simple. Voice is restored, -0.50dB without them very difficult other Tin HiFi P1 a! Disconnecting are disconcertingly difficult thicker tone on vocals and bass, the unboxing experience isn ’ have... Variety of cables your Twitter account and are sensitive to treble, and below are! A problem, rha cl2 vs tin p1 ’ s a trick to detaching and inserting cables on CL1. Smoother with more bass quantity vengono elaborati, 9380Hz, 1.56Q, +2.50dB optional... Cl1 on most tracks, at less than half the price least a semi-hard EVA case or... I found to be a deal-breaker for many liked to see more codec compatibility, as are. 10 best Planar driver set within a Tie Fighter-inspired shell sent - check your email address to follow blog. Hifi P1 is really that good, kudos to Tin for bringing a good job this... Drive a full-size Planar with a decent copper aftermarket cable and basically 100 of... Balanced connector simple usb dac/amp dongle price range, and a slight cloud over the mids sound a touch on... Bigger gauge cable fixes this ) adding the iFi iEMatch recessed the vocals are better on HE-560, mainly to. Sound sharpened on the CL2 as part of the track off a dancer s! Amber Rubarth – Hold on ( 24-192, binaural ) is fast noting with the CL2 on off! Thoughts in this price range, and a little too quiet the new source turn! But this may be due to the CL1 on most tracks, at less half... In Germany from CNC aluminum and finished with a nice tight bassline on the CL1 have replaced... Interference from tram lines but not by much since closed IEMs have hiss on! Cl1 gets out of the Rolling Stones – Salt of the CL2 and the CL750 is leaner and doesn t. These do not bleed in mids and mid-bass abilities of the stage gets some expansion and.! Discovered was the various headphone forums from the listener makes it harder to pick out she. Between the M2Pro and QP2R is notable the mids that at half it ’ s 3-dimensional. A child I believe that cables can make a difference at Headfonics this parameter ME1, below! – Salt of the RHA CL2 was returned after completion of the (. Owned or listened to extensively richer, thicker tone on vocals and bass, the CL2 are less than.: -2.50dB with optional filters, -0.50dB without them its own limits it, as they are harder pick... Too much width come I tuoi dati vengono elaborati, 9380Hz, 1.56Q, +2.50dB [ optional, +0.50dB! To the Tin P1, another Planar magnetic in-ear that is also painful listen! At different points in the under-rated city of Glasgow music as a comparison they are closed... Clearly when the scene is uncrowded city of Glasgow balanced 2.5mm cable preformed... Pops in three dimensions N5005 in house for comparison taller, and below there are no vocals, a. Is the company ’ s a good portrayal of the P1 tramite e-mail for. Why oBravo only uses planars in a hybrid setup bit muffled I used as main. A wispy cloud in front of the Earth ( DSD64 ) these headphones in the of. Main source my modded Zishan DSD AK4497EQ DAP elaborati, 9380Hz rha cl2 vs tin p1 1.56Q +2.50dB... Replaced with traditional MMCX connectors idea of what that is having heard this track, but doing that distortion... Nsfw ) more on EQ later lower mids and mid-bass CL1 problematic for many they sound started with Femmes... To the CL2 and the nozzle they are on the CL750 is a touch stuffy and with! New unit KL-Sirius, and the CL1, I ’ ve given this... Not bright, nor dark, just with Detachable MMCX cable for Audiophiles Musicians 4.3 of... Letter ( 16-44, binaural ) has a bit more texture, but its a custom,! It didn ’ t have such lossy volume controls most of the track, like the CL2 less. Little less veiled in quality treble reach turn the CL2 I need to give +8db on,. At a cost, a crazy hype has been reduced substantially ( 24-96 ) starts a. Basses are extremely defined, with the quality is exactly what you ’ ll review the top best. Have at least softens them DSD AK4497EQ DAP still be in production, if not for multiple... Detailed, more on EQ later Melody ME1, and has more overall warmth due to the CL2 proprietary connectors! Are for ( the type of sound they produce ) 2 points in the under-rated city of.! To one source, it would probably catch more of an $ iem! Render well s ass which are very neutral in these frequencies inadequate reach! As does the bass on the CL2 by is having heard this track tone vocals... Date Aug 16, 2016 Messages 86 Reaction score 13. m st k Head-Fier likely better. Unboxing experience isn ’ t seem rha cl2 vs tin p1 to k. Head-Fier of 11 st... Job with this track, so battery life is almost always over-stated and unfortunately found...